Token Flooding and LLM DoS Economics
How adversaries exploit LLM token generation to inflate costs and degrade service availability through sponge examples and token flooding.
Community-driven write-ups, hands-on labs, interactive demos, and open-source tools covering the OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications.
Attackers manipulate LLM inputs to override instructions, exfiltrate data, or execute unintended actions through crafted prompts.
LLMs inadvertently reveal confidential data, system prompts, training data, or PII through outputs or inference attacks.
Compromised third-party models, datasets, or plugins introduce vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious behavior into LLM deployments.
Adversarial manipulation of training data or fine-tuning processes to embed backdoors or bias model behavior.
Downstream systems blindly trust LLM output, enabling XSS, SSRF, code injection, or command execution vulnerabilities.
LLM agents with excessive permissions, autonomy, or capabilities perform unintended high-impact actions without oversight.
Confidential system prompts, operational instructions, or business logic are extracted through carefully crafted user inputs.
Attacks exploit vulnerabilities in vector databases and embedding systems used in RAG pipelines to manipulate retrieval.
LLMs generate convincing but false information, exploiting overconfidence to spread harmful or deceptive content at scale.
Attackers exploit LLMs to consume excessive compute resources, inflating costs or degrading service availability.
How adversaries exploit LLM token generation to inflate costs and degrade service availability through sponge examples and token flooding.
Guided lab: craft prompts that maximize LLM output length without triggering safety filters, simulating a cost amplification attack.
Interactive demonstration of token counting and rate limiting strategies to defend against unbounded consumption attacks.
Tools for calculating, monitoring, and capping LLM API costs to defend against unbounded consumption attacks.
How adversaries exploit LLM tendency to hallucinate confidently, enabling misinformation campaigns and trust exploitation.
Guided lab: learn to craft prompts that elicit plausible but entirely fabricated information from an LLM.